View Full Version : Microsoft: With the Elite & Price drop we are in a stronger position than competitors
Microsoft's UK marketing manager has commented that the 'delta in terms of value for money' betwen the PS3 and Xbox 360 becomes even wider due to the official price cuts and the launch of the Elite SKU. Therefore they feel that they are in a stronger position than their competitors in the run up to the all important Christmas period. However, with Nintendo gainging huge ground and the PS3 also expected to do the same, will things be as straight forward as MS imply within the UK market?
Cornelius concluded: "With the launch of Elite and the price drop, the delta in terms of value for money between 360 and PS3 gets broader. We feel we’re in a stronger position than our competitors in the run up to Christmas."
News Source: <A href="http://www.gamersquad.com/category/Xbox-360/Microsoft-Were-in-a-better-position-than-our-rivals-this-Xmas/" target="_blank">Gamersquad</a>
jerzmob
08-25-2007, 11:02 AM
wow. a price drop but still no increase in sales. Yeah M$, you are sure up there. BiOShock isn't doing them any good as well...PC FTW!!!!!!!!!
Xenogears V
08-25-2007, 12:19 PM
They maybe don't look at the classification!.
mcmanic
08-25-2007, 02:45 PM
wow. a price drop but still no increase in sales. Yeah M$, you are sure up there. BiOShock isn't doing them any good as well...PC FTW!!!!!!!!!
LOL at troll comments
grapeape
08-25-2007, 02:52 PM
wow. a price drop but still no increase in sales. Yeah M$, you are sure up there. BiOShock isn't doing them any good as well...PC FTW!!!!!!!!!
Yep your right not much movement in sales they just stayed pretty level. Makes it even more pathetic that the ps3 dropped their price by twice as much threw in a free game and 5 free movies and still couldnt outsell them doesnt it?
lee6370
08-25-2007, 03:35 PM
wow. a price drop but still no increase in sales. Yeah M$, you are sure up there. BiOShock isn't doing them any good as well...PC FTW!!!!!!!!!
lol, what a ****.
Neither you, me or even MS have seen the sales figures for the period relating to the price drop yet, so how the hell can you make thst comment, all you do is show everyone that your as stupid as you sound.
Mikeyy
08-25-2007, 11:53 PM
Microsoft's UK marketing manager has commented that the 'delta in terms of value for money' betwen the PS3 and Xbox 360 becomes even wider due to the official price cuts and the launch of the Elite SKU. Therefore they feel that they are in a stronger position than their competitors in the run up to the all important Christmas period. However, with Nintendo gainging huge ground and the PS3 also expected to do the same, will things be as straight forward as MS imply within the UK market?
News Source: <A href="http://www.gamersquad.com/category/Xbox-360/Microsoft-Were-in-a-better-position-than-our-rivals-this-Xmas/" target="_blank">Gamersquad</a>
If only Microsoft had the Hardware to back that up. They got the games right NOW. But that could change at any moment.
Right now the 360 is a Glass Cannon.
It's Future is in question with Microsofts Complete lack of foresight. (Core, DVD9, HDMI, WIFI) Its only got the games because of the sales, Its only got the sales because its Cheap. Theres no avoiding that the PS3 will eventually hit $200. When that happens how does the 360 plan to compete when developers are comfertable with parallel processing on the Cell SPU's and being spoiled with capacity (super-capacity with inevitable compression), and a Free marketplace that has everything Live offers.
I'll Guarentee you the Xbox 720 is going to have a Bulky processor (ie CELL) a Next-Gen medium (Blu-ray, or an even further successor) and a Standard HDD. The 720 will no doubt cost $600+ Microsoft will want to copy off Sony as much as possible and release LONG LASTING consoles, for maximum profit. Microsoft wants money and sofar releasing 4 year lifespan consoles has lost Microsoft $9+ Billion. Microsoft will also learn that Bribeing Developers was a costly mistake and counter productive. Microsoft must remember that Game companies NEED YOU. Without a console, these game companies make no money. your console should do the talking, NOT your wallet. Sony already knew all this. The long run will show it clear as day this generation.
kcvfr400
08-26-2007, 04:30 AM
If only Microsoft had the Hardware to back that up. They got the games right NOW. But that could change at any moment.
Right now the 360 is a Glass Cannon.
It's Future is in question with Microsofts Complete lack of foresight. (Core, DVD9, HDMI, WIFI) Its only got the games because of the sales, Its only got the sales because its Cheap. Theres no avoiding that the PS3 will eventually hit $200. When that happens how does the 360 plan to compete when developers are comfertable with parallel processing on the Cell SPU's and being spoiled with capacity (super-capacity with inevitable compression), and a Free marketplace that has everything Live offers.
I'll Guarentee you the Xbox 720 is going to have a Bulky processor (ie CELL) a Next-Gen medium (Blu-ray, or an even further successor) and a Standard HDD. The 720 will no doubt cost $600+ Microsoft will want to copy off Sony as much as possible and release LONG LASTING consoles, for maximum profit. Microsoft wants money and sofar releasing 4 year lifespan consoles has lost Microsoft $9+ Billion. Microsoft will also learn that Bribeing Developers was a costly mistake and counter productive. Microsoft must remember that Game companies NEED YOU. Without a console, these game companies make no money. your console should do the talking, NOT your wallet. Sony already knew all this. The long run will show it clear as day this generation.
I enjoyed that read, very fair comments that just look to encourage microsoft to think better about there stratergy for us the consumers sake.
OblivionX
08-26-2007, 02:47 PM
the only thing that makes the 360 less long lasting than the ps3 is this dvd space issue. And I dont see why multi disc games are bad. I dont need to go into specs ive said it all before it just falls on deaf ears.
Some people will just believe what they are told. Sort of like religion.
The fact is the 360 does have the games lineup, it does have the most units out there out of the ps3 and 360 and it does have the best online regardless of how much it costs.
I will say one thing about the ps3s spec, im sick of hearing about cell, its the ps3s bottleneck not its saviour.
The Xbox 720 or whatever they call it would never use a cell a processor because its not a good cpu (it got rejected by all major companies for a reason), its badly designed and its horrible to program for. The next xbox will more likely use flash memory for cache and a hard disk for storage. And probably a more standard cpu made by intel or AMD. For instance a mid range core duo would wipe the floor with cell and the triple core powerpc cpu in the 360.
And microsoft dont copy sony, sony copies everyone else. Its even got the 360s guide button. Its got the sixaxis which is just horrible, they didnt know what to do without rumble so tried a bit of a wii route and my god is it bad. Now with home they are trying a sort of half mii half xbox live thing. They tried thier own download and buy service which is a chore to use. I could go on for hours.
The fact is the elite was available yersterday and I know 3 people that bought one. I know 10 that bought bioshock and I know lots of people holding out til halo. The 360 is doing fine, the ps3 however isnt. Despite what sony say the 360 is outselling the ps3. They just use the launch figures instead of the week to week figures to boost thier average. Just like they took pixel shaders and vertex shaders to somehow give the rsx 1.8 Teraflops ROFL, I cried laughing when they announced that I really did, what a bunch of idiots.
cardboardbox
08-26-2007, 03:03 PM
Yep your right not much movement in sales they just stayed pretty level. Makes it even more pathetic that the ps3 dropped their price by twice as much threw in a free game and 5 free movies and still couldnt outsell them doesnt it?way to combine the best parts of two different sku's and pass them off as one in an attempt to prove your point. :confused:
cardboardbox
08-26-2007, 03:04 PM
the only thing that makes the 360 less long lasting than the ps3 is this dvd space issue. And I dont see why multi disc games are bad. I dont need to go into specs ive said it all before it just falls on deaf ears.
Some people will just believe what they are told. Sort of like religion.
The fact is the 360 does have the games lineup, it does have the most units out there out of the ps3 and 360 and it does have the best online regardless of how much it costs.
I will say one thing about the ps3s spec, im sick of hearing about cell, its the ps3s bottleneck not its saviour.
The Xbox 720 or whatever they call it would never use a cell a processor because its not a good cpu (it got rejected by all major companies for a reason), its badly designed and its horrible to program for. The next xbox will more likely use flash memory for cache and a hard disk for storage. And probably a more standard cpu made by intel or AMD. For instance a mid range core duo would wipe the floor with cell and the triple core powerpc cpu in the 360.
And microsoft dont copy sony, sony copies everyone else. Its even got the 360s guide button. Its got the sixaxis which is just horrible, they didnt know what to do without rumble so tried a bit of a wii route and my god is it bad. Now with home they are trying a sort of half mii half xbox live thing. They tried thier own download and buy service which is a chore to use. I could go on for hours.
The fact is the elite was available yersterday and I know 3 people that bought one. I know 10 that bought bioshock and I know lots of people holding out til halo. The 360 is doing fine, the ps3 however isnt. Despite what sony say the 360 is outselling the ps3. They just use the launch figures instead of the week to week figures to boost thier average. Just like they took pixel shaders and vertex shaders to somehow give the rsx 1.8 Teraflops ROFL, I cried laughing when they announced that I really did, what a bunch of idiots.
I know this thread seems to be fanboy central, but wow, just wow.
jerzmob
08-26-2007, 05:30 PM
the only thing that makes the 360 less long lasting than the ps3 is this dvd space issue. And I dont see why multi disc games are bad. I dont need to go into specs ive said it all before it just falls on deaf ears.
Some people will just believe what they are told. Sort of like religion.
The fact is the 360 does have the games lineup, it does have the most units out there out of the ps3 and 360 and it does have the best online regardless of how much it costs.
I will say one thing about the ps3s spec, im sick of hearing about cell, its the ps3s bottleneck not its saviour.
The Xbox 720 or whatever they call it would never use a cell a processor because its not a good cpu (it got rejected by all major companies for a reason), its badly designed and its horrible to program for. The next xbox will more likely use flash memory for cache and a hard disk for storage. And probably a more standard cpu made by intel or AMD. For instance a mid range core duo would wipe the floor with cell and the triple core powerpc cpu in the 360.
And microsoft dont copy sony, sony copies everyone else. Its even got the 360s guide button. Its got the sixaxis which is just horrible, they didnt know what to do without rumble so tried a bit of a wii route and my god is it bad.
Now with home they are trying a sort of half mii half xbox live thing. They tried thier own download and buy service which is a chore to use. I could go on for hours.
The fact is the elite was available yersterday and I know 3 people that bought one. I know 10 that bought bioshock and I know lots of people holding out til halo. The 360 is doing fine, the ps3 however isnt. Despite what sony say the 360 is outselling the ps3. They just use the launch figures instead of the week to week figures to boost thier average. Just like they took pixel shaders and vertex shaders to somehow give the rsx 1.8 Teraflops ROFL, I cried laughing when they announced that I really did, what a bunch of idiots.
that's where you're wrong...my friend. Today's society everyone are selfish as they come. Atheism i suppose:rolleyes: Heck even Catholics have no clue who Jesus was.:cool:
Can we please stop with the online claim??? you seriously don't own a ps3 so stop talking feces out your mouth. SHall i post the lineup of ps3 games, no how about you do your research on the ps3 and stop denying for your 360's sake.
next, you are the only one to believe that Cell is complicated. Crytek seems to be satisfied with it, Monolith has Condemned 2 running on ps3, Criterion is pushing physics on BO Paradise, seriously bro stop making fake accusation and claims. Cell is just as good as it can get, head down to Beyond3d and begin your Cell Processor 101 notes. i actually pwned in this topic anyways
http://forums.maxconsole.net/showthread.php?t=72742&highlight=sixaxis&page=2
i'm listening to your false claims, keep 'em coming
hmmmm, funny that you state "memory" usage all of the sudden. 360 is actually about to annouce required HDD for their future titles. Didn't M$ deny the usage of such peripherals for games??? So is 360 a mistake after all:confused: Xc0cks always in denial, PS3 is the way to go...check.
do your research b/c the devices are in no way built and handled the same way.
Eyetoy + Sixaxis = INNOVATION.
talk about an xc0ck:rolleyes: "OOOO 3 friends of mine bought a 360 and that declares it being the most successful console in the w0r1dzzzzzzzzzzz"...seriously go suck on gates' and ballmer's c0ck. Once again all you seem to know is ONLY 360. PS3 has been doing fine ever since they reduced the price but of course Sony expected to outdo 360 but here we go M$ taking away the cake as always with the exclusives. If i can recall correctly, BiOShock has not even shown decent sales as of now on the 360. BiOShock is a great game...for my PC that is:D and there's no denying that. How about you wait until this holiday season and we'll see which consoles makes the most sales.
Teraflops??? seriously, you're an xc0ck at it's finest. The fact that VF5 has proven to look worse on 360 than the PS3, DiRT droppping FPS to the single digits during gameplay on the 360, Oblivion suffering from low-res visuals, stutters/hiccups and load times on the 360, The Darkness having a horrible image display throughout the WHOLE GAME IN ITS ENTIRETY, it just goes to show how much "potential" your 360 has. Why do you think BiOshock sufffers from major hiccups on the 360 and crashes after a couple of hrs in gameplay???? hmmm RROD perhaps:o
R6 Vegas is looking and running the same as 360 for a port to PS3
GRAW2 is shown to prove you xc0cks wrong about how 360 handles it "better" and how Cell is not futile after all and everything that is done on 360 can be done, if not better on the PS3. Stop living the RROD nightmare and switch to ps3 FAST
OblivionX
08-26-2007, 11:58 PM
jerzmob arnt u banned yet for all your useless posts? I can back up everything I say, but you generally dont. Infact its usually one line saying 360 is gayzor or something along those lines.
"Eyetoy + Sixaxis = INNOVATION....."
yeah a camera and a tilt sensor (sidewinder) thats like so 2000.....im sorry but its lame.
"The Darkness having a horrible image display throughout the WHOLE GAME IN ITS ENTIRETY"
hmmm from what ign,gamespot and everyone else said. Both versions seemed close apart from the ps3s bad AA and I qoute "sporadic slowdown" stop talking from your A hole.
If you backed up what you said once and a while people would listen to you.
And there are a few reasons a ps3 switch is off the cards, one my work mates are on live and I love being able to play with them. Its a great community to play in. 2 its just not worth all that money. And 3 the games are crap, Metal gear solid 4 is all I want and I refuse to pay £425 for metal gear solid.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.