cravavr3
02-07-2007, 12:30 PM
Ok,
Read through majority of posts here and get the feeling everying is saying the cyclowiz is clone if the wiinga.
What we have a PIC chip on the wiinga and what looks like a ubicom on the cyclowiz. If anyone dumped code on PIC would take some time to convert code over to ubicom. Not just a few days as would need to check responses are same and develope PCB.
Cyclowiz updatable, stealthmode. PIC would be capable of running stealth mode but not upgradable. Code could be changed to allow writing of ubicom by simple routines added.
Now the point that is driving me crazy, and everyone stating clone but feature that is not even on wiinga or at least posted. If in fact cyclowiz is a clone it would not be able to direct boot, yes direct boot of media. As wiinga requires ISO burnt to run backups. This alone is what points me to think that cyclowiz is not a clone, but a project that worked on its own. As code would involve more work and more hacking skills.
Now fact that both these modchips are swedish based as all support/documentation is english and swedish, would assume same people maybe working on projects together or gathering info and sharing. Maybe even same persons behind both chips.....
Seeing as the drivemod info was posted about security check of CAPITALS versus LOWERCASE same security word, by GC hacker TBMINC ( i beleive maybe wrong spelling ) Anyone coudl work on a modchip, as they all suddenly appeared after his speach or notice of chip coming.
So what i'm i missing that everyone is stating cyclwiz is clone of wiinga?????????????? must be more to this story or something i am missing......
Read through majority of posts here and get the feeling everying is saying the cyclowiz is clone if the wiinga.
What we have a PIC chip on the wiinga and what looks like a ubicom on the cyclowiz. If anyone dumped code on PIC would take some time to convert code over to ubicom. Not just a few days as would need to check responses are same and develope PCB.
Cyclowiz updatable, stealthmode. PIC would be capable of running stealth mode but not upgradable. Code could be changed to allow writing of ubicom by simple routines added.
Now the point that is driving me crazy, and everyone stating clone but feature that is not even on wiinga or at least posted. If in fact cyclowiz is a clone it would not be able to direct boot, yes direct boot of media. As wiinga requires ISO burnt to run backups. This alone is what points me to think that cyclowiz is not a clone, but a project that worked on its own. As code would involve more work and more hacking skills.
Now fact that both these modchips are swedish based as all support/documentation is english and swedish, would assume same people maybe working on projects together or gathering info and sharing. Maybe even same persons behind both chips.....
Seeing as the drivemod info was posted about security check of CAPITALS versus LOWERCASE same security word, by GC hacker TBMINC ( i beleive maybe wrong spelling ) Anyone coudl work on a modchip, as they all suddenly appeared after his speach or notice of chip coming.
So what i'm i missing that everyone is stating cyclwiz is clone of wiinga?????????????? must be more to this story or something i am missing......