Sorry folks, Too Human is actually pretty disappointing, 6.75/10

[Zeus]

Could all the hype just be to cover for a poor quality game? A new Game Informer review seems to suggest so. A scan of the magazine reveals that they have given Too Human a poor score of 6.75/10. So what's wrong with it, it's a case of where do we start? poor controls, poor story, poor boss fights... you get the picture already we'r sure!

<Center><A href="http://www.maxconsole.net/content_img/toohumas.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.maxconsole.net/content_img/toohumas1.jpg"></center></a>

[Dark_Vendetta]

already knew it after playing the demo

[JordanBlack68]

I knew this is gonna happen

[DaFireStarter]

No surprise here... They really could've made a great game but chose to release the game unfinished. I hope the game sales reflect the game quality.:mad::mad::mad:

[agantai]

TBH this is the case with 99% of the xbox360 games,nothing is new here & nothing to be expected but the usual overhyped average extremely boring games.

[siyrobbo]

It's been said that this game will see a big divide in its reviews, we'll see what it averages out at. Im still looking forward to it, enjoyed the hell out of the demo.

[Appleseed]

almost over a decade in development and this is what they do? actually i didnt even bother to play the demo.

by the way, AGAIN, who came up with the idea to turn maxconsole forums BACKWARDS? its like the entire internet has its forums the right way and then you come here and you need to go to the last page to read the actual newspost. what an idiotic idea.

[siyrobbo]

TBH this is the case with 99% of the xbox360 games,nothing is new here & nothing to be expected but the usual overhyped average extremely boring games.

that just screams fanboy to me (now waiting for the reply which says 'i own all three consoles and every game so i know what im talking about')

[agantai]

that just screams fanboy to me (now waiting for the reply which says 'i own all three consoles and every game so i know what im talking about')

no i dont own all 3 consoles i own 2 the xbox360 & wii + 2 handhelds (black psp slim & white ds lite).

[Snaileater]

TBH this is the case with 99% of the xbox360 games,nothing is new here & nothing to be expected but the usual overhyped average extremely boring games.

In the end, it's always Halo, Gears of War, Mass effect, and Fable. Any other game usually ends up overhyped. But now I don't need to state which games were overhyped :p

[diecast]

oh well playing a game free always makes it more worth while. so i'm sure it'll be worth the price of a dl-dvd. It's one of three rpgs coming out in a three week time. So if this sucks hopefully tales of verperia or Infinite Undiscovery will make up for it.

[willizm]

it's not that the game was underdeveloped. I thought it was flawed from the beginning. This is no surprise as I thought it was a crap game with pretty effects since the beginning.

[mashti]

it's not that the game was underdeveloped. I thought it was flawed from the beginning. This is no surprise as I thought it was a crap game with pretty effects since the beginning.

in your pirate sig you should change the ps3 collecting dust to ps3 waiting for a hack.

XBOX 360 Elite Hitachi
Wii - wiikey
PS3 -collecting dust
DSlite - M3 2gb
PSP - M33 3.52 FW full time pirate:eek:

[starwave]

its the "HAZE" for 360.:rolleyes:

[crono]

I liked the demo and going to get this game.

Just look for yourself if you like a game or not,the fist mariokart on snes did get very bad previeuws also the first time around,and it was a kickass game.
Just after some time everyone said it was a great game,revieuws also did get better.

[superaktieboy]

its the "HAZE" for 360.:rolleyes:

lol what i wanted to say xD the next Haze xD

[waldog]

its the "HAZE" for 360.:rolleyes:

I was thinking the same thing.

Now the fanboys can defend their all out title.

[Spnoz]

What I don't get, is why a game labelled as "poor", still gets 6.75/10, which is, on a 10 point scale, above average (as 5 is the absolute average on a 10 point scale).

To me, a poor game is one that score below average (5).

If to them, a 6.75/10 game is "poor", then their rating system is pretty flawed.

To me, 6.75/10 is "above average". Meaning it's not really that good, but still perform better than a totally generic & average game of this type.

Why bother having a 10 point scale if 6.75 is "poor"?

[lokii]

What I don't get, is why a game labelled as "poor", still gets 6.75/10, which is, on a 10 point scale, above average (as 5 is the absolute average on a 10 point scale).

To me, a poor game is one that score below average (5).

If to them, a 6.75/10 game is "poor", then their rating system is pretty flawed.

To me, 6.75/10 is "above average". Meaning it's not really that good, but still perform better than a totally generic & average game of this type.

Why bother having a 10 point scale if 6.75 is "poor"?

Its still poor considering the hype surrounding the game and its development length.

[mashti]

its the "HAZE" for 360.:rolleyes:

shame it couldn't be the uncharted or the resistance or the motorstorm or the mgs4 ...etc for the 360. ;)

tbh HAZE was a game most suitable for the 360,it fits very well in the 360 big library of crap games.

[Siku84]

Them going with a traditional control scheme and actual full control of the camera would've greatly improved this game in my opinion. They over did it with the controls. Everything else besides the graphics was pretty mediocre in my opinion.

If I want to attack with the right thumb stick rather than use it as a camera or aiming... I'll just play Jet Li's Rise to Honor which actually did it better lol.

I'm probably going to just rent, who knows maybe the full retail may have controller options? very doubtful.

[WickedSkin]

In the end, it's always Halo, Gears of War, Mass effect, and Fable. Any other game usually ends up overhyped. But now I don't need to state which games were overhyped :p

Hey Mass Effect and Gears of War was awesome.

[cardboardbox]

What I don't get, is why a game labelled as "poor", still gets 6.75/10, which is, on a 10 point scale, above average (as 5 is the absolute average on a 10 point scale).

To me, a poor game is one that score below average (5).

If to them, a 6.75/10 game is "poor", then their rating system is pretty flawed.

To me, 6.75/10 is "above average". Meaning it's not really that good, but still perform better than a totally generic & average game of this type.

Why bother having a 10 point scale if 6.75 is "poor"?Anything below 7 from game informer is a poor game. Its like grades in school where 70-100 is passing and everything below that is failure.

[Quadzilla]

6.75 in game informer is like a 2.0 everywhere else cause they generally overate games to nth degree. I played the demo and the most irritating thing to me was the clunky animations.

[Spnoz]

Anything below 7 from game informer is a poor game. Its like grades in school where 70-100 is passing and everything below that is failure.

Nevertheless, I still find that stupid. Why having a 10 point scale where you have 6 levels of "bad games" and only 3 for "good games"? (7 being average).

Anyway, I still consider review scores to be the quick reference for people who don't bother reading the actual review.

[SLAYERPSP]

already knew it after playing the demo i felt the same way and if GI didn't like it u know its bad they over rate everything

[kpn]

After playing the demo I would give it an 8/10 no way should it get much more than that but I think 6.75 is a bit harsh... well I don't have the final game so maybe its worse l0l

[lc204]

Almost as bad as Shadowrun. MS needs to know when to kill a bad game in the making. Also, releasing the demo before the release was a bad idea too.

[cardboardbox]

Nevertheless, I still find that stupid. Why having a 10 point scale where you have 6 levels of "bad games" and only 3 for "good games"? (7 being average).

Anyway, I still consider review scores to be the quick reference for people who don't bother reading the actual review.you can whine about their rating system all you want. Fact is, they thought the game sucked.

[cory149]

Bottom line: whoever reviewed it (or whichever company sponsors the reviewer) didn't get enough bribes to inflate the score. If it wasn't for such things, I doubt we'd ever see anything rated above 8 - which in turn puts the whole thing on a curve making 8 a 10 etc etc.
almost over a decade in development and this is what they do? actually i didnt even bother to play the demo.

by the way, AGAIN, who came up with the idea to turn maxconsole forums BACKWARDS? its like the entire internet has its forums the right way and then you come here and you need to go to the last page to read the actual newspost. what an idiotic idea.
Awww, teh qute lttle appleseed has an opinion :rolleyes: and then proves how much they know, too :p

For the last time - check your bloody settings, there is a big huge frigging button that says "Control Panel." Forums aren't like places such as gamefaqs, where you have to take it as they give it to you no matter how much it makes your eyes bleed - there are options so you can set it up to your own preference.

[sliggo]

The demo was crap so I expected nothing from this.

[Xenontc]

The controls for the game are just fucking horrible. The game would be so much better if the right analog stick controlled the camera instead of the stupid fucking sword.

[QrafTee]

In the end, it's always Halo, Gears of War, Mass effect, and Fable. Any other game usually ends up overhyped. But now I don't need to state which games were overhyped :p

Well Halo and Halo 2 were good; Halo 3 was overhyped though. Fable never lived up to expectations--but Lionhead Studios never live up to our expectations. Gears of War is good, and Mass Effect is pretty nice as well. So even some of their "AAA" games can be debated on whether they're actually good enough to hype about.

[waldog]

Fable never lived up to expectations--but Lionhead Studios never live up to our expectations.

You're right about that. I was so hyped to play that game. Then I played it ----- that is all.

[DEDDOA]

I guess it's down to taste, i actualy liked the contol method as it enables you to attack and move in multiple directions, plus the camera is usually facing in the direction you are headed, so doesn't need to be moved. That said if you need to look around, you just hold LB and move the stick. I'd have prefered if the LB option gave full camera movement while moving, but it does well enough from what I have seen.

I can definetly see this getting mixed reviews as it does tend to be aimed at a specific audience, and given many of the comments it seems to have succeded with that audiance. That said I do think optional controll schemes could have been an idea for wider market appeal, as it could have opened the game up without cheapening the experience for those of us who are actually happy the way it is.

[waldog]

I guess it's down to taste, i actualy liked the contol method as it enables you to attack and move in multiple directions, plus the camera is usually facing in the direction you are headed, so doesn't need to be moved. That said if you need to look around, you just hold LB and move the stick.

Really? The controls for the camera and sword sound like Ape Escape for ps2. The controls for that game seem good, so why wouldn't it work for this from others point of veiw? Is it sloppy or pretty sturdy?

[SkmNet]

was expecting this. was really looking forward to this game cause i always liked silicon knights games. but i had to force me to play the demo for about 30 mins. it was sooo boring. really disappointed.. it was like just walking around and smashing the same enemys all the time. booring.. :/

[DEDDOA]

Really? The controls for the camera and sword sound like Ape Escape for ps2. The controls for that game seem good, so why wouldn't it work for this from others point of veiw? Is it sloppy or pretty sturdy?

It may well do, can't recall ape escape, tho i think i may have it for my PSP, will have to give it a try (all i can remember is a bunch of monkey with a spinnign light on their heads :)).

To be honest with regards to the swords, i think that could be handled by a button with no problems, u can't move to any real degree when using them. pushing in a direction with the rights stick makes you charge in that direction so that could be handled as easily with the left stick.

I think the main issue is the multidirectional fireing with the guns, as in you can run 1 way and fire another, kind of like 3rd person strafing. I admit it does have the draw back in that your view can be limited at times, but i think it's the best you are going to manage without another hand and another stick and keep the same flexibility. Like i said tho, I think multiple controll schemes would have been a better idea, that way everyone can be happy. Maybe some sort of lock on feature to make up for the reduced control flexibility.

[Xenontc]

It may well do, can't recall ape escape, tho i think i may have it for my PSP, will have to give it a try (all i can remember is a bunch of monkey with a spinnign light on their heads :)).

To be honest with regards to the swords, i think that could be handled by a button with no problems, u can't move to any real degree when using them. pushing in a direction with the rights stick makes you charge in that direction so that could be handled as easily with the left stick.

I think the main issue is the multidirectional fireing with the guns, as in you can run 1 way and fire another, kind of like 3rd person strafing. I admit it does have the draw back in that your view can be limited at times, but i think it's the best you are going to manage without another hand and another stick and keep the same flexibility. Like i said tho, I think multiple controll schemes would have been a better idea, that way everyone can be happy. Maybe some sort of lock on feature to make up for the reduced control flexibility.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Use the left trigger for the sword (plus direction, keep in the tap and hold crap) and the right trigger for guns. No point in giving the guns a primary and secondary, when the secondary is just using two guns.

[Appleseed]

Bottom line: whoever reviewed it (or whichever company sponsors the reviewer) didn't get enough bribes to inflate the score. If it wasn't for such things, I doubt we'd ever see anything rated above 8 - which in turn puts the whole thing on a curve making 8 a 10 etc etc.

Awww, teh qute lttle appleseed has an opinion :rolleyes: and then proves how much they know, too :p

For the last time - check your bloody settings, there is a big huge frigging button that says "Control Panel." Forums aren't like places such as gamefaqs, where you have to take it as they give it to you no matter how much it makes your eyes bleed - there are options so you can set it up to your own preference.

whew, fixed things. that feels so much better.

oh and someting you said makes so much sense. afterall, if one watched reviews like zero punctution, where its brutal all on smattering of the game's bad points rather than its good points more often than not, you wouldnt want to play or buy many games at all.

which goes to show that these reviewers DO often enjoy nice portions of helpings from these developers or sponsors.

[yusky03]

In the end, it's always Halo, Gears of War, Mass effect, and Fable. Any other game usually ends up overhyped. But now I don't need to state which games were overhyped :p

Gears of War, Mass Effect, and Fable were amazing games but Halo was the main game that was overhyped. Halo 1 was great 2 was a little much and 3 was the worst imo.

[borbeatss]

in your pirate sig you should change the ps3 collecting dust to ps3 waiting for a hack.

full time pirate:eek:

Your a fucking loser pal, are you seriously thinking your cool because you don't pirate? I don't even know where your coming from, either way like I always say, we need drones like you to buy the games. Or we couldn't have as much fun. ;)

[hacktek]

That game smelled like crap since the day it was conceived.

[Ravenlockheart]

So then Assassins Creed is ass then to? IGN gave that game a 7.7, game trailers a 9.1, Teamxbox gave it a 7.9, B- on one-up, and I can go on... But yet wait this game was well received on both systems and people loved the hell out of this game..... So then why Judge a game on one review unless your a fan boy who has a Giant Metal Dildo up your a$$!! Until i see all reviews showing the same thing for Too Human, which it hasn't yet........ Then you can tell me this game is a$$! But until then shut all your god d@mn mouths and being a Sony fan boy or what ever you think you are! Plus IGN has done there preview review and they love the game! So again Don't cast judgment unless he cast judgment on thy self.

[waldog]

So then Assassins Creed is ass then to? IGN gave that game a 7.7, game trailers a 9.1, Teamxbox gave it a 7.9, B- on one-up, and I can go on... But yet wait this game was well received on both systems and people loved the hell out of this game..... So then why Judge a game on one review unless your a fan boy who has a Giant Metal Dildo up your a$$!! Until i see all reviews showing the same thing for Too Human, which it hasn't yet........ Then you can tell me this game is a$$! But until then shut all your god d@mn mouths and being a Sony fan boy or what ever you think you are! Plus IGN has done there preview review and they love the game! So again Don't cast judgment unless he cast judgment on thy self.

You need to get out more.


Assassins creed got old fast. Very repetitive.

[Xenontc]

So then Assassins Creed is ass then to? IGN gave that game a 7.7, game trailers a 9.1, Teamxbox gave it a 7.9, B- on one-up, and I can go on... But yet wait this game was well received on both systems and people loved the hell out of this game..... So then why Judge a game on one review unless your a fan boy who has a Giant Metal Dildo up your a$$!! Until i see all reviews showing the same thing for Too Human, which it hasn't yet........ Then you can tell me this game is a$$! But until then shut all your god d@mn mouths and being a Sony fan boy or what ever you think you are! Plus IGN has done there preview review and they love the game! So again Don't cast judgment unless he cast judgment on thy self.


Actually yes, AC was pretty much crap. It was great for an hour, but then I wanted to shoot myself for doing the EXACT SAME THING OVER AND OVER.

[benny32]

I could tell. Another Hypeware title. Write down all the magazines that hyped this trash and stop buying their magazines.

My life will be complete when EGM, and the rest of the poodles go out of commision.

My god, how can a game that is in devalopment for 10 years suck so bad? These devalopers should all be fired.

Nintendo is very good about getting rid of has been devalopers.

Rare: I thought they were nuts for selling off Rare, but after Star Fox Adventures, I knew they made the right choice. Instead they took the money they screwed MS over and gave it to Retro and Nintendo Software. They later made the first 3d Metroid. Much better investment.

Silikon Knights: After Eternal Darkness, they decided to snub Nintendo and go for the gold with another console. Nintendo said F off and they did. Now they have flopped miserably with this crappy game. Go to hell SK! You got served!:mad:

Factor 5: Beloved by Nintendo fans for the Rouge Squadron series, they tried their luck with the PS3. What a flop that crappy dragon game was. Panzer Dragoon owns that trash.

I'm glad Nintendo is good about throwing away worthless trash. I wonder if MS will think twice next time before they buy has been losers.

[cardboardbox]

So then Assassins Creed is ass then to? IGN gave that game a 7.7, game trailers a 9.1, Teamxbox gave it a 7.9, B- on one-up, and I can go on... But yet wait this game was well received on both systems and people loved the hell out of this game..... So then why Judge a game on one review unless your a fan boy who has a Giant Metal Dildo up your a$$!! Until i see all reviews showing the same thing for Too Human, which it hasn't yet........ Then you can tell me this game is a$$! But until then shut all your god d@mn mouths and being a Sony fan boy or what ever you think you are! Plus IGN has done there preview review and they love the game! So again Don't cast judgment unless he cast judgment on thy self.uhhh lets put this in context. Game Informer gave AC a ridiculously inflated 9.5.

I actually want to go download the demo now just to experience for myself the awesome suckiness of this thing.

[theindiearmy]

Since this is GI saying this, that must mean the game is really kickass and a must have.

Seriously, people still subscribe/buy/read/think of GameInformer :confused:

[Ravenlockheart]

You need to get out more.


Assassins creed got old fast. Very repetitive.


Yea but that's your Opinion not every one thoughts where the same as you. And yes I do get out a lot.... just about every one i know at college has either played the game and loved it or hated it. And i knew a lot of people who loved it. Once in a great moon i would meet a person who hated it.

Actually yes, AC was pretty much crap. It was great for an hour, but then I wanted to shoot myself for doing the EXACT SAME THING OVER AND OVER.

Again your Opinion... but not everyone's thinking the same way as you. And like i said before and I'll say it again Don't base a game by one review alone and have you even played the demo yet for Too Human? Cause if you haven't and this is if you haven't then your opinion doesn't mean ****. But if you have and you didn't like it the that's your opinion and i totally respect it.


uhhh lets put this in context. Game Informer gave AC a ridiculously inflated 9.5.

I actually want to go download the demo now just to experience for myself the awesome suckiness of this thing.


See what i mean though all gamer magazines tend to put there own thoughts on what is good and what is bad.... So to let yourself judge a game not some cheap ass gaming magazine. Yes i know that Game Informer gave AC a high score and Too Human a Low but what I'm trying to prove is the fact that not all reviews are necessarily true to what the game actually is like. And until i see all reviews that are this low then I believe the game sucks balls.... But with only one review out it shouldn't be judge as a bad game. Either you should wait until every one reviews it and see what the broad end of the reviews are like or rent the game and if you love it then buy it or if you don't then don't play it return it. And the Demo doesn't suck as so many people are saying on here.... but then again that's there opinion and i respect that. So any ways final thoughts here JUST GIVE TOO HUMAN A TRY AND DON'T BE A NAZI!

[John Crichton]

i liked the demo, i'm getting the game.

[Signa]

was there any doubt after hearing Dyack spewing when the demo came out? it was obvious that the game wasnt going to be great. he was doing preemptive damage control.

[Ravenlockheart]

Just to let you guys KNOW THIS! been looking online for reviews of this game... It has gotten a 93/100 from another place known as Game Magazine Greece. "now here comes something that i was going to say in my last posts" TOLD YOU SO!!! Now does that say terrible game.... no it doesn't! :P Any ways the case and point can't trust every review that comes out... could actually be true the game is as horrible as one magazine says it is..... But Like i said before and I'll say it again! DON'T JUDGE A GAME BEFORE PLAYING IT YOURSELF A$$ HOLE FAN BOYS! And if you guys want the prof here it is: http://www.gamestats.com/objects/748/748783/articles.html

But what i find also so funny is the fact that Game Informer gave the game 2 Different Review scores both not good but still... Kind of odd for a company to do to.

[DEDDOA]

Just to let you guys KNOW THIS! been looking online for reviews of this game... It has gotten a 93/100 from another place known as Game Magazine Greece. "now here comes something that i was going to say in my last posts" TOLD YOU SO!!! Now does that say terrible game.... no it doesn't! :P Any ways the case and point can't trust every review that comes out... could actually be true the game is as horrible as one magazine says it is..... But Like i said before and I'll say it again! DON'T JUDGE A GAME BEFORE PLAYING IT YOURSELF A$$ HOLE FAN BOYS! And if you guys want the prof here it is: http://www.gamestats.com/objects/748/748783/articles.html

But what i find also so funny is the fact that Game Informer gave the game 2 Different Review scores both not good but still... Kind of odd for a company to do to.

This is very true, the only other review/preview I have seen was negative but that was mainly a dig at Dyack and not at the game. So it's true not all reviews can be trusted as they can be tainted prejudice or preference, or like the one i mentioned, ulterior motives.

Seems tho much like I said, it's target audiance (I suspect the diablo fans) seem very pleased with it, the rest are pretty evenly split for or against it.

[Scorpion3]

it's not that the game was underdeveloped. I thought it was flawed from the beginning. This is no surprise as I thought it was a crap game with pretty effects since the beginning.

Really? I bought the game and the combination of Technology with Norse Mythology does very well in a lot of the story, but I was very disapointed with the controls. It's not as bad as all these Sony fanboys scream, because naturally they scream it at every game until it winds up on their PS2/PS3. Case and Point, Ninja Gaiden, Oblivion, and soon Bioshock. Not saying all negative reviews are because they are prejudice, just saying that reviews are utter **** anymore, if you want the game and you think it looks good, buy it and find out if you f*cked up spending $60 bucks on a POS. It's actually pretty fun.

[Xenontc]

Yea but that's your Opinion not every one thoughts where the same as you. And yes I do get out a lot.... just about every one i know at college has either played the game and loved it or hated it. And i knew a lot of people who loved it. Once in a great moon i would meet a person who hated it.



Again your Opinion... but not everyone's thinking the same way as you. And like i said before and I'll say it again Don't base a game by one review alone and have you even played the demo yet for Too Human? Cause if you haven't and this is if you haven't then your opinion doesn't mean ****. But if you have and you didn't like it the that's your opinion and i totally respect it.





See what i mean though all gamer magazines tend to put there own thoughts on what is good and what is bad.... So to let yourself judge a game not some cheap ass gaming magazine. Yes i know that Game Informer gave AC a high score and Too Human a Low but what I'm trying to prove is the fact that not all reviews are necessarily true to what the game actually is like. And until i see all reviews that are this low then I believe the game sucks balls.... But with only one review out it shouldn't be judge as a bad game. Either you should wait until every one reviews it and see what the broad end of the reviews are like or rent the game and if you love it then buy it or if you don't then don't play it return it. And the Demo doesn't suck as so many people are saying on here.... but then again that's there opinion and i respect that. So any ways final thoughts here JUST GIVE TOO HUMAN A TRY AND DON'T BE A NAZI!

And here's where your "It's your opinion" logic is completely flawed. You're saying we can't say it sucks because it's our opinion, but the people who review the game are allowed to? Sorry, that's not how it works.

Go back and read my other posts in this thread, I clearly stated that I played the demo, and that it fucking BLOWS. The controls are absolute ****, the gameplay is repetitive, the controls blow, the camera blows, the controls blow, you fight the same damn thing over and over. It's like they took the worst of Mass Effect and mixed it with the worst of Assassin's Creed. The result is a polished turd.

[Xenontc]

Just to let you guys KNOW THIS! been looking online for reviews of this game... It has gotten a 93/100 from another place known as Game Magazine Greece. "now here comes something that i was going to say in my last posts" TOLD YOU SO!!! Now does that say terrible game.... no it doesn't! :P Any ways the case and point can't trust every review that comes out... could actually be true the game is as horrible as one magazine says it is..... But Like i said before and I'll say it again! DON'T JUDGE A GAME BEFORE PLAYING IT YOURSELF A$$ HOLE FAN BOYS! And if you guys want the prof here it is: http://www.gamestats.com/objects/748/748783/articles.html

But what i find also so funny is the fact that Game Informer gave the game 2 Different Review scores both not good but still... Kind of odd for a company to do to.

It confuses me how fucking stupid you could be. When someone gives his or her opinion and says it sucks, you say his/her opinion doesn't matter. When someone gives an opinion saying it's great, you praise them. You sir, are a bigot.

Oh, and fanboy? Lol. I have all 3 consoles + a DS. If anything, I play my 360 at least 3x as much as my Wii, and I put maybe 20 hours into my PS3 since I bought it. So I play the 360 the most. Fanboy? No, because I acknowledge the flaws in the system design and I know a shitty game when I play one. Guess what? This game sucks.

[Ravenlockheart]

It confuses me how fucking stupid you could be. When someone gives his or her opinion and says it sucks, you say his/her opinion doesn't matter. When someone gives an opinion saying it's great, you praise them. You sir, are a bigot.

Oh, and fanboy? Lol. I have all 3 consoles + a DS. If anything, I play my 360 at least 3x as much as my Wii, and I put maybe 20 hours into my PS3 since I bought it. So I play the 360 the most. Fanboy? No, because I acknowledge the flaws in the system design and I know a shitty game when I play one. Guess what? This game sucks.

I'm not saying your opinion doesn't matter F tard... I respect your opinion. And if you feel its a shitty game then its your Opinion not every one else and doesn't mean every one else should follow your opinion. And being you have played the demo then i can fully support your Opinion about the game. It's the people who haven't played the demo that i disagree with or haven't played the game and automatically awesome its a horrible game cause another person says so instead of trying it out themselves and seeing what they think on a game. And if you actually read my comment before you would have know that was what i was talking about but instead your so g0d d@mn stupid that you let yourself automatically believe that i didn't support your opinion. I have also played the demo to and I happen to love it!And yes i do support praising but I also support the down comments to, but not what i was trying to get at... it was the fact i was saying the reviews are going to be mixed. So another words you should try out the game yourself and let you be the judge of the game... not the reviewers. SO BEFORE YOU GO OH MY G0D HE CALLED ME A F TARD AND A DUMB A$$! Read what i said ok? And might i say.... you sir are the bigot for not reading my full comment. You could have just said I have played the demo and i thought it sucked then i would have been like ok that's cool.... but no you got to be a retard and make me write this huge a$$ post to make you understand what i was talking about.

This is very true, the only other review/preview I have seen was negative but that was mainly a dig at Dyack and not at the game. So it's true not all reviews can be trusted as they can be tainted prejudice or preference, or like the one i mentioned, ulterior motives.

Seems tho much like I said, it's target audiance (I suspect the diablo fans) seem very pleased with it, the rest are pretty evenly split for or against it.


And some one gets what I'm talking about! :D Thanks man!

[Xenontc]

Let's clear a few things up.

You came into this thread without reading the entire thread. If you had read everything, you would have known that most of the people in here saying the game sucks, played the demo. Also, you would have read my post which is pretty much me saying 'I played the demo, it fucking sucks.' So don't go blabbing off about people not reading posts, when you yourself, haven't read the thread.

You then compared this game to a shitty game that got shitty ratings.

You said you refused to believe the poor ratings and told people to play the game for themselves.

You then showed a site that game it a 9.3 and your entire attitude changed. Once you saw the 9.3, you said that the game couldn't suck because they gave it a 9.3

YOU said to not judge a game before playing it. YOU have not played the full game. Therefore, by your logic, you have no right to say this game is good or bad.

Also, don't call me a bigot, especially since you didn't even know what the word meant prior to looking it up after reading my last post.

[Ravenlockheart]

Let's clear a few things up.

You came into this thread without reading the entire thread. If you had read everything, you would have known that most of the people in here saying the game sucks, played the demo. Also, you would have read my post which is pretty much me saying 'I played the demo, it fucking sucks.' So don't go blabbing off about people not reading posts, when you yourself, haven't read the thread.

You then compared this game to a shitty game that got shitty ratings.

You said you refused to believe the poor ratings and told people to play the game for themselves.

You then showed a site that game it a 9.3 and your entire attitude changed. Once you saw the 9.3, you said that the game couldn't suck because they gave it a 9.3

YOU said to not judge a game before playing it. YOU have not played the full game. Therefore, by your logic, you have no right to say this game is good or bad.

Also, don't call me a bigot, especially since you didn't even know what the word meant prior to looking it up after reading my last post.

Ok i forgot to read your post about you playing the demo sorry. I do apologize for that.... but I know what a bigot is.... you are so daft "also an english word go look it up. :P". I just choose not to us the word very often cause its a very English word. And I'm not from England even though i lived there for a while cause of the military life style from my father. And I didn't change my attitude towards the game I was just proving a case and point that the game has a different reviews and as i said on my first post here that it would! But if you also read most people on here are PS3 fanboys who haven't even played the game or demo for that factor and have no right to judge a game that they haven't even played "note some people calling it Haze for the 360". Heck they don't even own a 360! Not including you daft. Your one of the few people i respect for being honest cause you've played the game's demo at least. Yes i do believe you should play the game yourself "whether be demo or full game" sometimes the full game is better then the demo :case and point, call of duty 2:"... And second of all then you just proved a point that the game isn't cr@p then in fact cause you haven't played the full game either! But what i meant was in demo terms. So then i loved the game and you hated the game which i do respect. And if you want to go on demo terms we have a right to judge our opinion on whether the game is good or bad but not for other people. But again if you want to go on the judgment of full game wise then none of us on the thread have a right to say whether its good or bad because of the mixed reviews.

[Xenontc]

Well I'm glad you finally decided to calm down and speak like a normal human being, lol. The thing I was trying to get at about 'changing your attitude' in regards to the 93/100, was that you were all against reviews, saying how people should just play the game (and they should), then when you found out about the 93/100, you were basically like "OMFG I TOLD YOU! SOMEONE LIKES THIS GAME!". I didn't mean that you changed YOUR opinion about the game, it seemed like you changed your opinion on the whole aspect of reviewing.

About the COD2 thing. I didn't play the demo, but I played the game..nothing more than a generic FPS. The thing with TH, is that unless they completely revamp the controls and change the battles, the game will still suck. The demo is basically, walk/get attacked by 30 of the same things, walk/get attacked by 30 of the same thing +1 missile fucker whos annoying as hell, equip new sword/guns, walk/attack...etc. If the game is anything like that, no thank you.

I do agree with you about the retards who are trying to compare this to Haze. Odds are they haven't played either game and are just spewing **** out of their useless mouths. It's the exact same thing with Halo. So many people say it's nothing new, when in fact they have never played or seen it, and if they did, they'd know that Forge brings an infinite amount of extra gameplay to the series. Something Resistance, Killzone 2, MGS4 don't and won't ever offer. I've had tons of people call me a fanboy because I have Halo in my signature, when in fact I'm not advertising Halo, I'm advertising Grifball.

[Ravenlockheart]

Well I'm glad you finally decided to calm down and speak like a normal human being, lol. The thing I was trying to get at about 'changing your attitude' in regards to the 93/100, was that you were all against reviews, saying how people should just play the game (and they should), then when you found out about the 93/100, you were basically like "OMFG I TOLD YOU! SOMEONE LIKES THIS GAME!". I didn't mean that you changed YOUR opinion about the game, it seemed like you changed your opinion on the whole aspect of reviewing.

About the COD2 thing. I didn't play the demo, but I played the game..nothing more than a generic FPS. The thing with TH, is that unless they completely revamp the controls and change the battles, the game will still suck. The demo is basically, walk/get attacked by 30 of the same things, walk/get attacked by 30 of the same thing +1 missile fucker whos annoying as hell, equip new sword/guns, walk/attack...etc. If the game is anything like that, no thank you.

I do agree with you about the retards who are trying to compare this to Haze. Odds are they haven't played either game and are just spewing **** out of their useless mouths. It's the exact same thing with Halo. So many people say it's nothing new, when in fact they have never played or seen it, and if they did, they'd know that Forge brings an infinite amount of extra gameplay to the series. Something Resistance, Killzone 2, MGS4 don't and won't ever offer. I've had tons of people call me a fanboy because I have Halo in my signature, when in fact I'm not advertising Halo, I'm advertising Grifball.
Nah i didn't change my hole opinion about the review its just the fact i hate the people who jump on the band wagon of one review judges the game from the fan boy prospective and the people who haven't even tried the game in regards to demo wise or full game wise. And i imagen you wont like the game any ways cause i imagen they kept all the stuff you said in the game. "I'm guessing your not a fan of Diablo either?" So it wont be your cup of tea.... but i actually kind of liked it just took a while to get used to. :) You looking forward to Fable 2 at all?

And the reason why i use the COD 2 demo was cause i guess a lot of people said it was full of glitch lovableness. From second hand source though so I'm not 100% sure on that. But yea def the hole serious is a generic shooter in my book. :P Not a fan at all.

I loved Halo 3! Thought Forge was the best thing ever add to the serious as well as making the single player re playable with the skulls. "note not with forge making the single player re playable". But any ways griff ball kicks ass and I'm guessing you watch red vs blue to huh?



Any ways i respect your honesty! I truthfully do.

[Captain N1]

poor controlls will ruin any game.

[DEDDOA]

poor controlls will ruin any game.

This is indeed true, for me personally, this is the case with witht new Alone int he dark (no idea what number it is on now :) ) and Lair. Both could have been much better had the controlls been better implimented.

Too Human tho falls far short of them in the bad controlls department and is more in the not quite right department, tho thats likley down to taste as it doesn't seem to bother those who like the game, but seems (if comments on here are anything to go by) to put off those who don't like it anyway. So seemingly the controls may not be as much of a problem as claimed as if you don't like the game no control scheme will fix that.